My Personal Analysis and Review of the "War Of The World's" Film With Tom Cruise.
Peter Beckinsale
Tom Cruise took on a new role in the science fiction film "War Of The World's" which opened this summer. Watching the film, I couldn't help but be annoyed by it and the improper representation of extraterrestrial beings. I was so annoyed by it that I decided to write a review about the film here. If you haven't seen it and don't want find out what happens, skip this article.
While Tom Cruise does a great job as an actor, the problem I had with the film was its depiction of aliens. First off, aliens were shown invading cities in these gigantic metal spider like vehicles and zapping crowds of people with plasma like beams.
The film never gives an explanation of why the aliens invade earth and start killing people. They just show up and do it. I know this movie is based on a book so this is a review of the book and movie I guess.
It would have been nice to get an explanation of why the aliens did what they did. At one point in the film it seems as if the aliens were eating humans. First off I want everyone reading this article to understand something. In all my time researching UFOs and aliens, I have never heard of any alien killing of attacking a human. This includes abductees. They often say how they felt humiliated, but never do they mention physical harm.
The representation of military action by the aliens in War of The Worlds is similar to what humans would do if they invaded a city. Think about it. Humans fly jets over countries and bomb them, or roll up in tanks and blow apart buildings. Would an advanced civilization thousands or millions of years ahead of us do this?
Probably not. And to get to the level of technology that aliens appear to have achieved, it would be necessary for their species to work together harmoniously, something humans on planet earth don't do. I personally believe truly advanced civilizations would not need to fight and go to war. It takes more intelligence to be peaceful than to be violent. And everything I've heard about aliens shows that they are not a threat. At least not directly. But then again, I can never be sure of beings of whose intellects are so beyond my own.
The most annoying aspect of the film is the way it ended. While humans didn't beat the aliens militarily like they did in Independence Day(A cool movie, but a joke, humans can't beat aliens) The aliens killed themselves.
How? Well, the aliens drunk our water and ate humans, and I guess microorganisms in the food and water killed them.
That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. You have an advanced civilization of aliens, perhaps thousands or millions of years ahead of us, and they beat our armies, and yet they die because they were too dumb to investigate our microorganisms before they got here?
Come on, that doesn't make any sense.
I want to end this article with something for you to think about. Say we humans today figured out how to time travel, and took a stealth bomber or SR71 blackbird back to ancient Egypt of Babylon. What would the people think of us if we landed?
I think they would think we were gods. And with stealth technology, we could allow them to see us only if we wanted them to.
The Aurora UFO crash of 1897- Another Hole in the Government Invented UFOs Theory.
Peter Beckinsale
In my research on UFOs, I found a fascinating article related to a UFO crash in Aurora Texas in 1897. I begin checking numerous and reputable sources and they all said the same thing. I will quote here what was said in the April 19th edition of the Dallas Morning News:
“About 6 o’clock this morning, the early risers of Aurora were astonished at the sudden appearance of the airship which has been sailing around the country. It was traveling, due north, and much nearer the earth than before. Evidently some of the machinery was out of order, for it was making a speed of only ten or twelve miles an hour, and gradually settling toward the earth. It sailed over the public square and when it reached the north part of town, it collided with the tower of Judge Proctor’s windmill and went into pieces with a terrific explosion, scattering debris over several acres of ground, wrecking the windmill and water tank and destroying the judge’s flower garden. The pilot of the ship is supposed to have been the only one aboard, and while his remains were badly disfigured, enough of the original has been picked up to show that he was not an inhabitant of this world.
Mr. T. J. Weems, the U. S. Army Signal Services officer at this place and on astronomy gives it as his opinion that the pilot was an native of the planet Mars. Papers found on his person… evidently the records of his travels… are written in some unknown hieroglyphics and cannot be deciphered. The ship was too badly wrecked to form any conclusion to its construction or its motive power. It was built of an unknown metal, resembling somewhat a mixture of aluminum and silver, and it must have weighed several tons. The town, today, is full of people who are viewing the wreckage and gathering specimens of strange metal from the debris. The pilot’s funeral will take place tomorrow”.
I want everyone out there reading this article to understand the significance of this story. People have argued with me in the past and told me that they saw a "special" on TV where it was showed that the Nazis invented UFOs. Or I will here people say that the US government invented them. Here are several reasons these theories are inaccurate.
1. The Aurora Crash of 1897 took place roughly ten years before the Wright Brothers first tested their airplane.
2. The SR71 Blackbird and Stealth Bomber were hidden from the public by the US government for maybe a decade or more before they were disclosed. The US government has never disclosed a UFO aircraft.
3. UFOs are clearly far superior in flight than conventional aircraft. During the 1800s, flight was mostly made with Air Balloons. Nuclear energy had not even been discovered and utilized, and Quantum Mechanics wasn't discovered until 1925. Are we to believe that any nation on earth was capable of producing aircraft of this type at that time?
4. The term "UFO" hadn't even been invented yet in the 18th century. There were no Alien movies or War of the Worlds films back in those days. It would be extremely difficult for the people of Aurora Texas to create a hoax this elaborate. And what would they stand to gain by creating a hoax?
One thing is certain, at least in my mind. These beings, whoever they are, have been visiting are planet for quite some time. The fact that they crashed in Aurora indicates that they are not perfect, can die, and make mistakes. It can also be concluded that their level of technology are hundreds, maybe even thousands of years ahead of us.
Welcome To Dark-UFO.com - Exploring the evidence of the alien presence.
One of the things that has always confused me is the nature of religion and its purpose in our world. When I think about in more depth, it seems that religion is an attempt to answer those opened ended questions.
Why are we here? What is the meaning of life? Is there a life after death? These are questions that neither philosophy or science can answer with any certainty. Yet, if you talk to most devout religious people, they will often claim that their own religion answers these questions.
I was watching a documentary on UFOs/aliens recently and the issue was raised of whether or not ETs are responsible for giving us our religion. Bob Lazar claims on his site that aliens gave us religion so that our lives could have meaning, and they we wouldn't destroy ourselves.
That is a deep statement to make, and it is one I've spent a lot of time thinking about. When you study the history of religions, and you look at the way each was founded, there seems to be an overwhelming similarity between them. Siddhartha Gautama, the founder of Buddhism, had an experience were he attained "enlightenment."
Muhammad, the founder of Islam, was given a "message" from the angel Gabriel while in a cave. Jesus, the founder of Christianity, also had numerous mystical experiences where it seems he received messages.
Why is it that three of the worlds major religions all seem to have been found the same way? Each teaches different beliefs, but all seem to have the same origin. A man is given messages from a mystical source.
I believe this "source" is none other than extraterrestrials. If what Bob Lazar said is true, it makes a lot of sense. But why are the ETs giving us different religions, which over the centuries have led to division and war? If the ETs did give us our religions, did they know religious wars would occur beforehand?
This is a question that is not easy to ask, and most certainly not easy to answer. But I'm sure in the future we will find out.